NYC Woman Files Lawsuit Against DNA Company After Inaccurate Paternity Test Resulted in Abortion

In a distressing turn of events, a New York City woman is pursuing legal action against two DNA testing companies after a botched paternity test led her to make a life-altering decision regarding her pregnancy. The woman, who remains unnamed, claims that incorrect test results indicated her fiancé was not the father of her unborn child, prompting her to seek an abortion at five months pregnant.

The legal complaint, filed against Winn Health Labs and Ohio’s DNA Diagnostics Center, highlights a tragic sequence of events that began with a paternity test gone wrong. Initially filed in March, the lawsuit was amended earlier this month to reflect the profound emotional and relational fallout the woman has experienced. According to reports from People, she states that the erroneous test results not only led to the loss of her daughter but also contributed to the end of her long-term relationship.

"My daughter would have been born on the 17th of April," the 28-year-old administrative assistant shared with The New York Post. "I’m grieving. I just have a lot of emotions. These results were the reason why I decided to do what I did." The emotional toll has been immense, leading her to seek therapy and ultimately resulting in the dissolution of her engagement.

The backstory reveals a complicated relationship dynamic. The woman and her fiancé, referred to as John Doe in the lawsuit, had previously separated due to stress over fertility issues. During this time, she had a brief encounter with another man, identified in the suit as Jack Doe. After reconciling with John, she discovered she was pregnant and sought clarity on paternity through the DNA testing process.

In October, the couple opted for a non-invasive prenatal paternity test with the DNA Diagnostics Center, which directed them to Winn Health Labs for sample collection. Confident in the outcome, she even celebrated with a gender reveal party, only to be blindsided a few days later when the test results indicated a 99.9% probability that Jack was the father.

In a desperate attempt to salvage her relationship, the woman chose to terminate her pregnancy on November 7. However, months later, she received a shocking call from the DNA Diagnostics Center, revealing an "IT error" that meant Jack was not the father after all. The realization that her decision had been based on faulty information has left her feeling devastated and betrayed.

The lawsuit alleges that the woman has suffered "irreparable loss and injury" and "mental distress" due to the incident. "You took away the family I could have had. This was the person I was marrying. This is the person I wanted to build a family with," she expressed in a statement to NBC New York.

In defense, the DNA Diagnostics Center has emphasized its commitment to providing accurate testing for over three decades. They stated, "If any issue or concern is raised, we take immediate action, and DDC will perform a retest to validate the initial result."

This case raises significant questions about the reliability of paternity testing and the emotional ramifications that can arise from such errors. As the legal proceedings continue, many are left pondering the implications of medical technology on personal lives and the importance of accurate information in making critical life decisions.

For those interested in the intersection of faith, ethics, and medical technology, this story serves as a poignant reminder of the complexities involved in reproductive choices and the profound impact of medical errors. As the situation unfolds, the hope remains that this woman finds healing and that her story encourages a broader conversation about accountability in the medical field.