Court: Christian Ministry Can Support Sex Trafficking Victims Despite Religious Discrimination Lawsuit

A recent ruling from a federal judge has provided a significant boost to a Christian ministry dedicated to supporting victims of sex trafficking in Ohio. The United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted Gracehaven Inc. a preliminary injunction, allowing the organization to contract with Montgomery County despite allegations of religious discrimination.

Gracehaven, which focuses on helping young girls affected by sex trafficking, found itself in a legal battle after Montgomery County officials refused to renew its contract, citing the ministry’s policy of hiring only those who share its Christian beliefs. This decision, according to Gracehaven, violated the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment. Judge Michael Newman, who issued the ruling, noted that the county’s actions likely infringed upon Gracehaven’s constitutional rights by excluding the ministry from public benefits based solely on its religious hiring practices.

In his opinion, Judge Newman referenced the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in Carson v. Makin, which underscored the importance of protecting religious organizations from discrimination in public funding. He emphasized that the First Amendment safeguards against indirect penalties on religious exercise, reinforcing that states cannot exclude religious entities from public benefits simply because of their faith-based policies.

The legal defense for Gracehaven is being provided by the Alliance Defending Freedom (ADF), a nonprofit organization committed to protecting religious freedom. ADF Legal Counsel Jake Reed expressed gratitude for the court’s ruling, stating, “The government cannot deny public benefits to a Christian ministry that is caring for young survivors of sex trafficking solely because of its religious character and exercise.” Reed highlighted the essential role Gracehaven plays in providing care and support for vulnerable girls.

Scott Arnold, the director of Gracehaven, echoed these sentiments, affirming that the organization’s mission relies heavily on its team of Christian employees. He emphasized the importance of having like-minded individuals who can relate to the trauma these young girls have faced, helping them rebuild their lives with dignity.

The controversy began when Gracehaven sought to renew its contract, which had been in place for nearly a decade. The ministry proposed a “non-discrimination provision” that would allow it to maintain its hiring policies, but Montgomery County rejected this request. Despite Gracehaven’s willingness to move forward without the provision, the county still declined to renew the contract, citing concerns about the ministry’s religious hiring practices.

This ruling marks a pivotal moment for Gracehaven as it continues to fight for its right to operate according to its religious beliefs while serving a critical need in the community. The court’s decision not only provides temporary relief but also sets a precedent for future cases involving religious organizations and public funding.

As the legal proceedings move forward, Gracehaven remains committed to its mission of helping young girls escape the horrors of sex trafficking and find hope and healing. The organization’s fight for religious freedom is not just about contracts; it’s about ensuring that faith-based organizations can continue to serve those in need without compromising their core beliefs.

For more information on Gracehaven and its mission, visit their official website Gracehaven. To learn more about the legal implications of this case, check out resources from the Alliance Defending Freedom.

Stay tuned for updates on this important case and others affecting the intersection of faith and public service.