In recent years, the term New Apostolic Reformation (NAR) has stirred up quite the conversation among Christians and observers alike. Originally coined by Dr. Peter Wagner, the term was meant to describe a movement of independent charismatic churches embracing a model of apostolic leadership. However, it has since taken on a life of its own, often misapplied to various leaders and ideologies that don’t quite fit the original definition. Let’s clear the air and tackle some of the most common misconceptions about the NAR.
First off, not everyone who uses the term "apostolic" is part of the NAR. This is a major fallacy. The Bible outlines a clear definition of apostolic ministry in Ephesians 4:11, and this has been recognized for centuries. Throughout church history, leaders have embraced apostolic functions without subscribing to the more extreme interpretations associated with the NAR. The term "apostolic" simply refers to a biblical model of leadership and mission, not a centralized organization. Even in the early church, the office of Bishop emerged to describe apostolic succession, showing that the concept of apostolic ministry has long been a part of Christian tradition.
Another misconception is that the NAR operates like a structured denomination. Critics often portray it as a hierarchical organization with a unified doctrine, but the reality is quite different. There is no central governing body or universal statement of faith that binds all so-called NAR leaders. While some apostolic networks exist, they typically function independently, emphasizing the diversity within the movement rather than a monolithic structure.
A common claim is that the United States Coalition of Apostolic Leaders (USCAL) holds authority over all NAR leaders in the U.S. This is simply not true. USCAL was designed as a horizontal association, not a top-down authority. Many leaders associated with the NAR have no ties to USCAL, and the organization does not have the power to discipline or remove individuals from ministry. It’s essential to understand that the NAR is not a single entity but a collection of diverse leaders and movements.
Interestingly, many assume that the NAR is a recent American phenomenon. In truth, its roots can be traced back to independent church movements in Africa and Asia during the early 20th century. As Dr. Wagner noted, the apostolic movement gained significant traction in the Global South, where local leaders established self-governing churches outside Western denominational structures. Today, some of the fastest-growing apostolic movements are found in Latin America, Africa, and Asia, underscoring the global nature of this movement.
Let’s talk about authority. Not all apostles seek to exert control over churches and pastors. In fact, true apostolic leadership, as depicted in the New Testament, emphasizes servant leadership and spiritual mentoring. While some may misuse the title, most apostolic leaders aim to empower local churches rather than dominate them. The early church was characterized by relationships, not authoritarian rule.
The notion that the NAR promotes Dominionism or seeks political takeover is another exaggerated myth. While some individuals within the broader charismatic world may advocate for cultural influence, the mainstream NAR movement does not endorse unlawful political control. In a democratic society, Christians have the right to advocate for their values and engage in political processes, but this should be done through love and service, not coercion. The Great Commission calls us to make disciples, not to seize power.
Additionally, the claim that apostolic leaders teach extra-biblical revelation is misleading. While prophetic insight is indeed a biblical reality, responsible apostolic leaders affirm the supremacy of Scripture and test all prophetic words against the Bible. Any teachings that contradict Scripture are not representative of true apostolic ministry.
The prosperity gospel is another hot-button issue often linked to the NAR. While some high-profile leaders may emphasize prosperity theology, it does not define apostolic ministry. Many apostolic leaders advocate for biblical stewardship and generosity without endorsing materialism. It’s important to recognize that many faithful apostolic leaders around the world live in challenging circumstances and do not promote a prosperity agenda.
It’s also worth noting that not every megachurch pastor or charismatic leader is part of the NAR. Many well-known leaders do not identify with the NAR or its core ideas. Mischaracterizing these leaders only serves to muddy the waters further.
Finally, while the NAR is often portrayed as a significant threat to the Church, the real challenges we face include biblical illiteracy, secularism, and moral compromise. Many who are mischaracterized as NAR leaders are actively engaged in evangelism, church planting, and discipleship. These efforts are far from a threat; they are a blessing to the body of Christ.
In conclusion, the hysteria surrounding the NAR has led to a great deal of misinformation and unnecessary division within the Church. While it’s crucial to address errors and unbiblical practices, it’s equally important to avoid painting all apostolic leaders with the same broad brush. Understanding the nuances of the NAR can foster unity and clarity in the body of Christ, allowing us to focus on the real spiritual battles we face today.
For more insights on this topic, consider checking out resources from The Gospel Coalition or Christianity Today, which offer a range of perspectives on contemporary Christian issues.